It’s Official: Massachusetts Democrats Reject Rule of Law
- 0 Comments
The “fix” is now in the books: When a Democrat is governor of Massachusetts, he shall have the power to appoint interim senators or representatives to replace those who quit, are indicted, or die in office.
But when confused voters freak out and elect a Republican governor… why, that power shall quickly be rescinded. Can’t have those unpatriotic, evil, racist, Nazi-like conservatives sending one of their own into the U.S. Senate and scuttling the Obamic takeover of health care! Far better to do without a senator for a few months.
Patrick has argued the state stood to suffer without full Senate representation before the special election campaign, but some fellow Democrats have joined Republicans in accusing him of a power grab. Patrick said he was untroubled by criticism from Republican lawmakers.
“I’m quite satisfied that I am both within the law and within tradition,” Patrick said.
Absolutely… in the grand tradition of New Jersey, where the Democrats summarily dumped their 2002 senatorial nominee, incumbent Robert Torricelli, because he was losing to Republican Doug Forrester in the polling — and because evidence of Torricelli’s corruption was leaking out (the two reasons may have been related). The Democrats simply erased his name from the ballot and substituted the much more popular retired Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ, 100%)… and the New Jersey Supreme Court said sure, why not? It’s Joisey rules!
All right, we always knew it: Boston, Trenton, it’s all the same Democratic Party. But it is good that they’ve finally been forced to rip off the mask and confess who — and what — they really are.
