A Modish Proposal
- 0 Comments
A silly thought just occurred. Utterly ridiculous.
One of the big bugaboos of angloamophous google climbup chants, often played as the trump card in any AGCC debate — where “debate” has that special liberal definition of a lengthy series of pronunciamentos by the anointed, followed by the suppression of Mr. Opponent’s research papers, and topped off by a short prison term — is that global warming climate change must surely cause the oceans to rise, unless we slavishly follow the path of least prosperity enunciated at Copenhagen and send “tens of trillions of dollars” to the Third World (whence Algore can skim a good tithe off the top for his various carbon-trading ventures). Such propitiation is necessary to keep the oceans unaroused.
Algore says the seas will surge 20 to 50 feet this century alone, but he may be exaggerating just slightly. Gore’s fellow climatologists and oceanographers seem to believe that a rise of 0.6 to 2.0 feet is more plausible.
But I had this ridiculous thought, as I said, of an alternative. A risible one, but perhaps it’s worth at least mentioning… if for no other reason than to confirm readers in their condescending opinions that I am nought but a fool and clown.
Thus: Instead of spending hundreds of billions to cripple our energy production, paid for by even more hundreds of billions in carbon taxation, capped with those tens of trillions op.cit., why doesn’t the West simply agree to build 10-foot levees protecting every populated, low-lying area in every developing country?
Ten feet would surely cover the rise. (Heck, five feet would do it; but let’s not be stingy.) We could dredge local lagoons for the dirt, or even dig strip mines around nearby volcanos… in between sacrifices of native virgins, assuming any can be found.
Suppose we’re talking about twenty thousand miles of levees. Considering the price of labor in those countries, it’s hard to believe that such berms would cost more than, say, a million dollars a mile. That means the entire project could be executed for a scant $20 billion; even adding in 100% overhead, that’s doubtless less than the amount Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT, 100%) has personally looted from the U.S. Treasury in earmarks alone.
In addition, think of the melodramatic improvements in third-world economies that would flow from actually hiring locals to perform real work, work that protects their own country and floods the local municipalities with stacks of American dollars! Much better and more dignified than pouring water upon the sand in the form of U.N. welfare checks.
I know, I know: preposterous, absurd, nonsensical, whimsical, buffoonery. But hey, somebody has to make such doltish suggestions. I’ve always said that the next time I need some idiot to make a proposal, I’d do it myself. And now I have.
That’s it; I’m done.
